------- Comment #16 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-04-27 17:10
-------
And, by the way, as regards my Comment #6, which really was about your case 1
in the first testcase, I confirm GCC is already fine: a is always treated as an
lvalue in the body of the function. Also, the test is malformed for other
reasons, there is no constructor possibly accepting a as argument.
I'm also renaming the summary.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-04-27 17:10:57
date| |
Summary|[C++0x] rvalue references |[C++0x] ICE in
| |build_init_list_var_init
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39923
