------- Comment #13 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-06-16 17:26 ------- Subject: Re: wrong size of struct with some bit-fields on ppc-eabi
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, mcvick_e at iname dot com wrote: > Furthermore, as stated numerous comments back with a link to the actual PPC > ABI, bitfields are to have a 32-bit alignment period. Are you implying that There's no point in quoting an ABI document when you have chosen to use an option (-mno-bit-align in the original bug report) whose sole purpose is to deviate from the ABI. Or when you are using features such as attributes that are outside the scope of the ABI document (which is an ABI for ISO C). In fact I can only reproduce the described symptoms with -mbit-align, not -mno-bit-align - it appears the handling of this option may have been broken in the conversion to .opt files, which would be a genuine regression. The default, without ABI-breaking options, is that both have size 8, which is in accordance with the latest ABI draft being developed in the Power.org ABI working group. That is, the default behavior (for the original case without attributes) is correct, but the option that gives the size being 6 should be -mno-bit-align not -mbit-align, and this appears to have been broken since 4.1. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28763