------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-03 09:53 -------
Could not find the problem so far, cf. symbol.c's verify_bind_c_derived_type as
starting point.
* * *
The following TODO should be checked; I heard it is invalid C99 (as per grammar
in 6.7.2.1 Structure and union specifiers) but valid C++. One should check it
in the F2003 (F2008 draft?) as this the definite source.
/* TODO: is this really an error? */
if (curr_comp == NULL)
{
gfc_error ("Derived type '%s' at %L is empty",
derived_sym->name, &(derived_sym->declared_at));
return FAILURE;
}
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40920
