------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-29 10:01 -------
I wonder why it uses the extra temporary - that shouldn't be necessary.
Ah, it's because of
else if (ts.type == BT_DERIVED)
{
gfc_add_block_to_block (&block, &lse->pre);
gfc_add_block_to_block (&block, &rse->pre);
tmp = gfc_evaluate_now (rse->expr, &block);
tmp = fold_build1 (VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (lse->expr), tmp);
gfc_add_modify (&block, lse->expr, tmp);
changing that to something that doesn't call gfc_evaluate_now in the
correct cases should fix this. What do we expect there? My first
bet would be to use EXPR_P as a check. Or maybe we can drop the
gfc_evaluate_now call completely here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-09-29 10:01:31
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41494
