There are (define_insn "addsi_1_zext" [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r") (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,r") (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "g,li")))) (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))] "TARGET_64BIT && ix86_binary_operator_ok (PLUS, SImode, operands)" { switch (get_attr_type (insn)) { case TYPE_LEA: operands[2] = SET_SRC (XVECEXP (PATTERN (insn), 0, 0)); return "lea{l}\t{%a2, %k0|%k0, %a2}";
case TYPE_INCDEC: if (operands[2] == const1_rtx) return "inc{l}\t%k0"; else { gcc_assert (operands[2] == constm1_rtx); return "dec{l}\t%k0"; } default: /* Make things pretty and `subl $4,%eax' rather than `addl $-4, %eax'. Exceptions: -128 encodes smaller than 128, so swap sign and op. */ if (CONST_INT_P (operands[2]) && (INTVAL (operands[2]) == 128 || (INTVAL (operands[2]) < 0 && INTVAL (operands[2]) != -128))) { operands[2] = GEN_INT (-INTVAL (operands[2])); return "sub{l}\t{%2, %k0|%k0, %2}"; } return "add{l}\t{%2, %k0|%k0, %2}"; } } Shouldn't it be (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,0") Am I missing something? -- Summary: Typo in addsi_1_zext? Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com GCC target triplet: x86_64-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41665