------- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-06 16:36 ------- By the same argument, shouldn't we drop the assignment early, and make it a non-assigning call? The assignment is also supposed to occur after the call, although it's not denoted in a separate statement, but SSA analysis doesn't complain about it. Shouldn't it?
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42363
