------- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-18 09:54 -------
This PR has me somewhat flummoxed. I have changed the title to reflect the
fact that it does not matter if the component is allocatable or a pointer.
Also, a component reference of an allocatable array of derived types works
correctly.
There is no reason whatsoever why a temporary is generated; I just cannot see
who is making that happen.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] |[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression]
|Wrong-code with allocatable |Wrong-code with allocatable
|compounds |or pointer components in
| |elemental functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736
