------- Comment #4 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2010-02-22 04:29 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> But doesn't this error happens during instantiation as the error message
> indicates? If definition of Node::FooNode is commented out, the templates
> themselves are accepted.
What I meant to say is this: during parsing, it doesn't see Node::test as
a member of the base class, but it sees it as a member of the enclosing
class in the same way as S::I::f() in
struct S {
int i;
struct I {
int f() { return i; }
};
}
would see S::i -- since they are both members of the same enclosing class S.
I.e., Node::FooOpNode::f() sees Node::test() as a sibling, not a member
of the base class, and so the call is registered as a function call, not
a call of a member function with this as argument.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43135
