------- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-22 23:23
-------
I don't think this should be P1, as getting the old behavior is apparently
doable by hand, but I'm a big fan of backwards-compatibility and if the GCS
haven't been updated then I think that GCC (as a GNU package) ought to try to
follow that.
Thanks,
-- Mark
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43132
