------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-05 00:57 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Thank you. Now I understand the real problem. > But still, it's nasty. > I wonder C++0x fix this issue.
Considering the defect report against the C++ standard is still on the active list, I doubt it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43261
