------- Comment #4 from boostcpp at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 12:26 ------- It looks like gcc is correct.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43315
------- Comment #4 from boostcpp at gmail dot com 2010-03-11 12:26 ------- It looks like gcc is correct.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43315