------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-17 09:53 -------
Subject: Bug 43331

Author: burnus
Date: Wed Mar 17 09:53:40 2010
New Revision: 157512

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=157512
Log:
2010-03-17  Tobias Burnus  <bur...@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/43331
        * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_array_index_offset,gfc_conv_array_ref,
        gfc_conv_ss_startstride): Remove no-longer-needed cp_was_assumed
        check.
        * decl.c (gfc_match_derived_decl): Don't mark assumed-size Cray
        pointees as having explizit size.
        * expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Remove now unreachable Cray pointee
        check.
        * trans-types.c (gfc_is_nodesc_array): Add cp_was_assumed to
        * assert.
        (gfc_sym_type): Don't mark Cray pointees as restricted pointers.
        * resolve.c (resolve_symbol): Handle cp_was_assumed.
        * trans-decl.c (gfc_trans_deferred_vars): Ditto.
        (gfc_finish_var_decl): Don't mark Cray pointees as restricted
        pointers.

2010-03-17  Tobias Burnus  <bur...@net-b.de>

        PR fortran/43331
        * gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_1.f90: Update dg-error message.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fortran/decl.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/expr.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
    trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-types.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_1.f90


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43331

Reply via email to