------- Comment #6 from schaub-johannes at web dot de 2010-04-02 14:02 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Thanks for pointing out that this has changed since C++03, though the change > was to fix to something that was clearly broken. > > In any case, I disagree with issue 983. The point of the example is that it > doesn't matter what subobject it refers to, as the type of &D::i is 'int > B::*'. >
I notified Daniel Kruegler about this, since the DR got CD2 status. He replied that you might want to consider reopening it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41796
