------- Comment #1 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-08 22:13 ------- Hmm - so why is it that we add an initialization for reg:XI 136 with a const_int 0 in .175r.init_regs
adding initialization in test of reg 136 at in block 3 for insn 12.
(insn 91 11 12 3 /tmp/n.c:13 (set (reg:XI 136 [ D.3722 ])
(const_int 0 [0x0])) -1 (nil))
There's something fundamentally funny going on here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43590
