------- Comment #10 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-12 06:43 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> I confirmed with the dsymutil maintainer that my reading of his response was
> correct. Indeed, the warning may or may not be significant and has to be
> checked for each instance. So if all four test cases are actually emitting
> valid dwarf, we can drop the usage of -lm on darwin[921] (although we will
> have
> to
> add a dg-prune-output to eliminate the failures from these false warnings.
OK, sorry for the noise on the list.
We will, however, have to figure out what to do for D9.. and D8... since we
can't expect a fix there.. I suppose.
--
iains at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43254
