------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-04-19 02:13
-------
In any case, Andrew is right (if I understand correctly the gist of his
message), that a conforming implementation of the FCD can *only* fail to
compile the provided snippet *when* the types are explicitely provided like
that: we boil down to uint32_t&& which *cannot* bind to an lvalue.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|navin dot kumar at gmail dot|
|com |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43785
