------- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-15 10:21 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > Wild shot: has this anything to do with 43969?
Actually I don't think so. At least the patch I posted yesterday does not fix PR43969: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-05/msg00155.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
