[Bug c++/44409] explicit call of a defined copy constructor does not work

[redi at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-03 22:42 -------
Yes, this is eligible for copy elision, see [class.copy]

— when a temporary class object that has not been bound to a reference (12.2)
would be copied/moved
to a class object with the same cv-unqualified type, the copy/move
operation can be omitted by
constructing the temporary object directly into the target of the omitted
copy/move


-- 

redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44409