------- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 15:50 -------
I am going to close this as WONTFIX for the following reasons:
* We do not want this because:
a) We have too many options.
b) These options would be of very limited and temporary use but we will have
to support them forever.
c) c++0x features are spread all over the compiler -> this is hard to
implement properly as an after-thought.
d) The additional checking will slow down the compiler for no significant
gain. We are too slow already.
* We have too many open PRs, so it is not worth it to keep this open just in
case.
Sorry about this but I hope you can understand.
--
manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44244
