------- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-08 13:29 ------- > Still the alternative is probably correct more often. So if that fixes the > issue for you we can go with that until I manage to finish the alignment > tracking.
Yes, that cannot be worse than the current one. Note that IVOPTS won't generate misaligned accesses out of aligned ones so using the MEM type is correct here. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44843
