------- Comment #12 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-12 16:09 ------- Seriously, go away. I'll get far ruder if you're going to open bug reports worded like this:
(In reply to comment #0) > Don't bother trying to understand why I need the & operand to work as stated > in > C99, or why I need the code to be cdecl compliant, that is too complicated for > you and it would just confuse you. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45265
