------- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-20 08:45 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Error: Dummy 'x' at (1) cannot have an initializer > > I think this is easy to understand, an additional short message about why it > can't have an initializer will be better.
Do you have a suggestion? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45337