------- Comment #32 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2010-09-01 
15:18 -------
(In reply to comment #31)

> I compared revision 163733 against revision 163733 + gcc-pr45234-2.patch
> with a cross compiler to x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0.  I saw no
> differences in .su files for gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c nor
> gcc.target/i386/stack-usage-realign.c.  Are you sure they pass
> on Darwin with revision 163733?

   Actually it appears that...

FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c compilation,  -Os  (internal
compiler error)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/sprintf-chk.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c scan-file foo\\t(256|264)\\tstatic
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-usage-realign.c scan-file

are actually new regressions present in unpatched gcc trunk...


I will do a regression hunt later today to find out the offending commit.



Reply via email to