------- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 20:57
> Original patch submitted with
I think I can prove that my patch doesn't affect code generation, except
possibly on the SPARC, so I'm a little skeptical about your diagnosis. Are you
sure it's not r163679 instead?
> Test cases added with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg00503.html.
I'll adjust them for Darwin.