------- Comment #9 from marc dot glisse at normalesup dot org 2010-09-06 17:48 ------- (In reply to comment #8) > Draft patch, tested x86_64-linux
Nice. Just to confirm, that's indeed what I had in mind, except that I was going to rename __is_iterator_helper to __has_iterator_category and move "||is_pointer" from the helper to __is_iterator (and then use __has_iterator_category for __iterator_traits). But it is equivalent. Now to the hardest part: deciding whether to apply it ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45549
