------- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 12:10 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the quick fix!
Well, it was *your* fix, so *I* should thank *you* :)
Anyway, I think the patch in comment #2 qualifies as obvious, and has no
regressions, as noted by Dominique. Will commit soon.
--
janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-09-15 13:57:41 |2010-09-16 12:10:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45674