------- Comment #28 from joaquin at tid dot es 2010-09-20 17:34 -------
> US 113, ES 2, US 118 / Issue 579 have been closed as NAD, thus
> let's figure out how best obtain O(1) in our implementation...
Do you have a rationale for the closing of this NB comments?
N3133 shows 579 unchanged. I was told that someone reported about
the existence of a O(1) singly-linked list implementation in
Rapperswil, but I don't have additional details.
I'd wait to get the full picture before going to a doubly-linked
list: the commitee had full info on the issue, so if they closed
579 as NAD they are supposed to be able to provide a rationale.