--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot> 
2010-09-25 03:00:24 UTC ---
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:16:53AM +0000, kargl at gcc dot wrote:
> Interesting**3.  If you simply remove the private
> and public statement then everything works as one
> would expect.
> And finally, an even more interesting bug.
> Change the interface statement to 
>   interface operator(.eq.)
>     module procedure eq_foo
>   end interface operator(==)

I have a patch that appears to fix this one.
I think it is more of a bandaid than a proper fix
in that I think .eq. should be simply substituted
with == on the input stream during parsing.

Configure bugmail:
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Reply via email to