--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu>
2010-09-25 03:00:24 UTC ---
On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 12:16:53AM +0000, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Interesting**3. If you simply remove the private
> and public statement then everything works as one
> would expect.
> And finally, an even more interesting bug.
> Change the interface statement to
> interface operator(.eq.)
> module procedure eq_foo
> end interface operator(==)
I have a patch that appears to fix this one.
I think it is more of a bandaid than a proper fix
in that I think .eq. should be simply substituted
with == on the input stream during parsing.
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.