http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl <sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu> 2010-09-25 15:01:19 UTC --- On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 09:04:32AM +0000, LpSolit at netscape dot net wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45778 > > --- Comment #3 from Fr??d??ric Buclin <LpSolit at netscape dot net> > 2010-09-25 09:04:24 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #2) > > I also think that the last four lines quoted above should > > go away. Do we really need the 150+ byte message tacked > > onto ever message posted in bugzilla? > > If you are complaining about emails being 150 bytes too large, that's a pretty > weak reason. Also, these 4 lines are in the signature of the email. Any good > email client would display them in a less prominent way, e.g. Thunderbird. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. So, how do I selectively strip of these signatures with mutt and elm and leave all other signatures that I want to see alone? Are you saying that you do not find http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2010-09/msg02740.html to be too cluttered?. Yes, some of us do use the email archive to read old threads. With this email there will now be 7 copies of the signature in the archive (not counting the 3 examples purposely included in the text of the email for discussion). How are you going to force people into trimming their replies to emails to carefully remove the signature? There are numerous examples of people who simply hit reply, add their text, and hit send without editing the original text. -- Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
