http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45740
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-02
14:39:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> In contrast to my annotation in the previous example, C551 does not apply
> (since it only talks about nonpointers). And C552 only says that a protected
> pointer cannot appear in a "pointer association context" (i.e. the LHS of a
> pointer assignment). It does not say that a protected pointer cannot appear on
> the RHS of a pointer assignment!?!
I think I scratch that part. I still do not see what is meant by the
"proc-pointer" part in
"C551 A nonpointer object that has the PROTECTED attribute and is accessed by
use association shall not appear [...] as the [...] proc-target in a
pointer-assignment-stmt."
as PROTECTED can only be applied to proc pointers (and normal variables).
I think I will close this PR as INVALID - as the other issue is taken care of
in
PR 45290.
