http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45964
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-10-11
14:08:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Ok and how is the case with the first template keyword, which Comeau says is
> incorrect and gcc accepts it?
>
> const int A< a>::B<b>::template value = A<a>::B<b>::C::value;
> ^^^^^^^^
>
> In my eyes it seems to be the same issue as the second one? How is it there?
> Which compiler is right?
Hmm, yes _that_ might be a bug in G++, because of the statement in 14.2p5 which
I quoted in comment 2. That can be reduced to:
template<int a>
struct A {
static const int value;
};
template<int a>
const int A< a>::template value = 0;
