http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46348
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Last reconfirmed| |2010.11.07 18:43:45
Resolution|FIXED |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2010-11-07
18:43:45 UTC ---
Jason, unfortunately the original std::bitset issues aren't all fixed yet. If
you apply the patchlet I'm attaching here too for your convenience to
std::bitset and then run the v3 testsuite, you get this new ICE:
FAIL: 23_containers/bitset/cons/constexpr.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/paolo/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_common_types.h:654:20:
in constexpr expansion of '((std::bitset<256ul>*)(&
__v))->std::bitset<_Nb>::bitset [with long unsigned int _Nb = 256ul]()'
/home/paolo/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk-build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bitset:814:7:
in constexpr expansion of
'std::bitset<256ul>::<anonymous>.std::_Base_bitset<_Nw>::_Base_bitset [with
long unsigned int _Nw = 4ul]()'
/home/paolo/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_common_types.h:654:20:
internal compiler error: tree check: expected record_type or union_type or
qual_union_type, have integer_type in build_special_member_call, at
cp/call.c:6342
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
I'll try to come up with a reduced testcase myself ASAP.
