http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46838
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-12-28 12:51:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Here's a patch:
The patch in comment #4 had a few regressions (e.g. on alloc_comp_basics_1.f90
etc), but the following version regtests cleanly:
Index: gcc/fortran/expr.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fortran/expr.c (revision 168293)
+++ gcc/fortran/expr.c (working copy)
@@ -3648,7 +3648,8 @@ gfc_default_initializer (gfc_typespec *ts)
/* See if we have a default initializer in this, but not in nested
types (otherwise we could use gfc_has_default_initializer()). */
for (comp = ts->u.derived->components; comp; comp = comp->next)
- if (comp->initializer || comp->attr.allocatable)
+ if (comp->initializer || comp->attr.allocatable
+ || (comp->ts.type == BT_CLASS && CLASS_DATA (comp)->attr.allocatable))
break;
if (!comp)
@@ -3665,7 +3666,8 @@ gfc_default_initializer (gfc_typespec *ts)
if (comp->initializer)
ctor->expr = gfc_copy_expr (comp->initializer);
- if (comp->attr.allocatable)
+ if (comp->attr.allocatable
+ || (comp->ts.type == BT_CLASS && CLASS_DATA (comp)->attr.allocatable))
{
ctor->expr = gfc_get_expr ();
ctor->expr->expr_type = EXPR_NULL;