http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48257
--- Comment #9 from Mohsin <mohsinrzaidi at gmail dot com> 2011-03-24 09:52:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I don't see any errors being thrown. I am not trying to nit-pick but I've > > raised this issue because I was affected by it and had to spend several days > > isolating it. It would have made my life a whole lot easier if, as you > > claim, > > libstdc++ had thrown an error. > > I never claimed there'd be an exception throw in your original example, I said > it's undefined behaviour. An exception is thrown if n > max_size() > Agreed. > > Just a request, but please let the discussion complete before you go ahead > > and > > mark the bug as Resolved-Invalid. I don't mind it being marked invalid, but > > I > > consider it disrespectful for you to not even wait for my response and > > rushing > > to mark it as invalid. Once we're through discussing, I will mark it invalid > > myself if necessary. > > That's not how it works, most users do not close their own bugs, maintainers > don't want to keep revisiting old bugs to see if the user has decided to > accept > the resolution yet. Agreed.(In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > > I don't see any errors being thrown. I am not trying to nit-pick but I've > > raised this issue because I was affected by it and had to spend several days > > isolating it. It would have made my life a whole lot easier if, as you > > claim, > > libstdc++ had thrown an error. > > I never claimed there'd be an exception throw in your original example, I said > it's undefined behaviour. An exception is thrown if n > max_size() > > > Just a request, but please let the discussion complete before you go ahead > > and > > mark the bug as Resolved-Invalid. I don't mind it being marked invalid, but > > I > > consider it disrespectful for you to not even wait for my response and > > rushing > > to mark it as invalid. Once we're through discussing, I will mark it invalid > > myself if necessary. > > That's not how it works, most users do not close their own bugs, maintainers > don't want to keep revisiting old bugs to see if the user has decided to > accept > the resolution yet. Agreed, thanks.
