http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-28 11:18:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf. > > given that Mike has approved, > > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64-darwin10, I would think you > > could apply it. > > I have bootstrapped gcc on x86-64-darwin10 with the patch in comment #12 on > top > of revision 171401 without failures for the tests ran by lto.exp (full test by > tomorrow). > > Now I wonder what are the tests > > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20100722-1_0.c > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1_0.c > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr46940_0.c > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/pr47188_0.c > gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr43157.c > > supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported" > on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support. They are various tests for previously existing bugs (mostly ICEs). Of course they now work.