http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022

--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-05-17 
15:54:19 UTC ---
All in all, now that I understand the issue with the temporary, this seems
really sort of a NAD, maybe the wording needs only clarifying that you don't
want to add std::begin and std::end overloads, no?

Reply via email to