http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49187
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-05-27 09:34:45 UTC --- yes, the change was intentional but these parts must have been missed, see the thread beginning at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-05/msg00072.html
