http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49352
--- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen <irar at il dot ibm.com> 2011-06-10 13:30:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Actually, should vect_is_slp_reduction be called at all if check_reduction > is false? I think without check_reduction e.g. nothing ensures that code is > commutative and associative... Do you mean to avoid swapping of operands? We can pass a parameter to indicate whether to swap. But I am ok with not calling it at all. Thanks, Ira
