http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41138
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gmail dot com> 2011-06-10 17:44:47 UTC --- Here's another test case, one that does involve slicing and where a consistent but differently phrased warning would, IMO, be useful. Perhaps something like: warning: slicing high order bits in implicit constant conversion cat << EOF | gcc -c -xc - struct S { unsigned a:1; unsigned b:1; }; void f (struct S *s, int i) { s->a = i & 0x10; /* line 7: no warning */ s->b = i & 0x80; /* line 8: warning */ } EOF <stdin>: In function âfâ: <stdin>:8:5: warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion [-Woverflow]