http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
David Rosa <jdrosa at yahoo dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jdrosa at yahoo dot com --- Comment #21 from David Rosa <jdrosa at yahoo dot com> 2011-06-28 14:14:37 UTC --- I want to add my voice to others who have asked that the priority of this bug be elevated to P2. Eliminating the secondary function of -I- as quoted from the GNU preprocessor documentation is unacceptable. "Second, the directory containing the current file is not searched for anything, unless it happens to be one of the directories named by an -I switch." Even if a different switch is used, like the -ignore-source-dir I've heard some rumblings about, can this issue please be elevated in priority and addressed soon? For our code base, we utilize gcc along with commercial cross-compilers. All of the cross-compilers we use support an option that implements the original -I- behavior and in order to maintain our existing code base, we either -I- to no longer be deprecated or replaced with a different option that implements the same behavior.