http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50248
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2011-08-31
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[C++0x] tries to use |[C++0x] unnecessary
|variadic constructor when |instantiation of constexpr
|it should use default |constructor
|constructor |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-31
13:29:33 UTC ---
The copy constructor isn't being defined, but the compiler is instantiating the
constexpr constructor to find out if it is really constexpr, and therefore
whether the implicitly-declared copy constructor should be declared constexpr.
We decided at Bloomington that we should just consider instantiations of
constexpr templates to be constexpr, not instantiate them to check.
