http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
--- Comment #23 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> 2011-11-10 11:09:02 UTC --- Dear Tobias, I tried this, in the hope of fixing a problem that I have with the last big part of the class array patch. To my surprise, it caused errors like: test1.f90:24:0: internal compiler error: in cgraph_analyze_functions, at cgraphunit.c:1193 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. Cheers Paul On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 11:07 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Attachment #25730|0 |1 > is obsolete| | > > --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-09 > 10:07:54 UTC --- > Created attachment 25766 > --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25766 > Updated draft patch > > I am not sure whether it is the nicest patch, but pushing __copy to the top > based by the name should work. (A Fortran name may not start with an > underscore.) An alternative patch would be to handle this on the Fortran AST > level. > This patch was only lightly tested by compiling select_type_12.f03 and the > test > of comment 18. > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug. >
