http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51981
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2012-01-25
15:00:26 UTC ---
Marc gave you an important practical advice and rationale, but as matter of
principle is more important that the function is *non standard*, really if you
use that you are *outside* the new C++11 Standard, is that clear? And the name
isn't uglified thus even if we wanted we could not add it and remain
conforming. This issue is invalid.
