http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-28 08:41:28 UTC --- Created attachment 26768 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26768 Patch to add DImode abs The attached patch adds DImode abs and did not introduce new failures when tested against rev 184589. I'm a bit confused, as this is exactly the same code as I used before to add DImode abs, and before it was failing in some cases. Either there was another bug that got fixed in the middle-end optimizers, or this is just coincidence. I've seen that other expanders use force_reg to make sure that operands will be in regs ... would that be the safer way of doing it?
