http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC --- On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650 > > --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot > Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC --- > > --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> > > 2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC --- > [...] > > If they are related (which I doubt), removing the call to cleanup_cfg > > in cfgexpand.c should fix them. That's the only real change in > > this patch - previously the cleanup_cfg call was conditional on a > > present EH region tree (thus, all of these issues are latent and > > just require a slightly different testcase) > > Indeed: with your patch applied and the call #if 0'd, the tests still pass. and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the issue here? Thanks. Richard.
