http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53946
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-12
23:48:57 UTC ---
>this is how musl libc defines it.
Then there is a mismatch between musl libc and GCC. GCC and glibc define it to
be long on x86_64.
Also musl libc is not currently supported as a target for GCC, there are some
changes needed to be made to GCC to support it fully.