http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
--- Comment #20 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-08-01 14:27:30 UTC --- On 1-Aug-12, at 10:20 AM, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote: > The difference in extracts and deposits may not be the problem. The - > O2 code appears to have the same extracts as the > -O1 code. I'll see if I can find where the real difference arises. Doh, the correct result is inlined at -O2. foo is still mis-compiled. -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
