http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55195
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-11-04 23:50:44 UTC --- On 4-Nov-12, at 12:31 PM, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Such a length attribute is not considered variable by > shorten_branches. > > You need to include a clause that is directly in the attribute, e.g. > (and (match_test "0") (eq (match_dup 0) (pc))) In some sense, this seems like a hack which might be optimized by an attribute processor. What about a way to mark length attributes as variable? Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
