http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436



Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

   Last reconfirmed|                            |2012-11-22

     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1



--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-22 
12:53:54 UTC ---

Yes, A<T>::B is a dependent base of A<T>::C, so lookup should find A::m not

B::m

Reply via email to