http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55436
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-11-22 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-11-22 12:53:54 UTC --- Yes, A<T>::B is a dependent base of A<T>::C, so lookup should find A::m not B::m