http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55685
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-12-14
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-14
10:56:45 UTC ---
Even more simplified and turned (hopefully) into valid testcase:
typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
template <size_t T, size_t U>
struct A;
template <typename T> struct B
{
static A <sizeof (T), 0> x;
};
template <typename T>
A <sizeof (T), 0> B <T>::x;
As expected, started with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192141
I knew why I was initially proposing the far less risky hack.
